Article Index

Computachem
E-Newsletter



Editor:
Neil Johnston


Regular Contributor:
Rollo Manning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

Home March 2000
Edition #2

Published Twice a Month

1. Around and About
2. Guest Article:Comments on NCP Review
3. Some E-Commerce Statistics
4. Supermarket Shudder
5. Complementary Therapy: Items of Interest
6. Internet Preparation

AROUND AND ABOUT:
Welcome to the second edition of the Computachem E-Newsletter and thank you to those pharmacists who passed on comment and support. One comment concerned the final draft of the COAG review, that had modified one very important aspect regarding non-pharmacist minority shareholders. The following is an actual extract from the final recommendations:

"Due to the risk of conflict of interest of shareholders, and the difficulties in determining the extent to which minority shareholdings may compromise pharmacist control of a pharmacy, operating companies with minority shareholdings held by non-pharmacists are not considered to be appropriate ownership structures for pharmacy businesses."

It is a relief to know that pharmacy now has an opportunity to develop some creative corporate structures strong enough to withstand the changes that are poised to sweep through all forms of business over the next five to seven years. This month we are featuring a guest article from Rollo Manning. Rollo is a pharmacist with wide experience, ranging from community pharmacy and industry, to the pharmacy political. He is currently the senior government policy officer, for pharmacy, in the Northern Territory, and is well qualified to comment on events from his unique perspective. We are pleased to publish his material. The invitation to be a guest contributor is also extended to all persons who would like to utilise this unique forum to express a point of view. Readers may remember that the decision to dispense NHS prescriptions in public hospitals was announced in this newsletter last month. So far, there has been no comment in the media that I have noticed, to stimulate debate on this major shift in government policy. Details are also sparse within the hospital system itself, but there is speculation that the HIC has offered hospitals a mark-up on the cost of pharmaceuticals (but no dispensing fee). Given that hospitals purchase under contract approximately 20% cheaper than community pharmacies, this would still bring the cost per prescription under a pharmacist's cost price. The HIC would certainly be able to cap its expenditure at the expense of community pharmacy, if it is able to transfer market share into the hospital system. If any reader has any information on this topic I would be very pleased to receive it. Please note that all newsletters are being archived on the Computachem web site, which can be accessed at http://www.computachem.com.au

Back to Top

COMMENT ON NCP REVIEWS AND WHAT CAN BE LEARNED...by Rollo Manning:
Retail pharmacy will remain an uncompetitive, insulated industry, susceptible to Government intervention if it does not move with the times into the 21st century. National Competition Policy (NCP) is not new. It is not a tool for governments to reign in the small operator in favour of the big three retail giants. It is not a tool to deprive rural and remote communities of essential services. It is a philosophy to encourage the public and private sectors to work together towards a more efficient, cost effective and accessible approach to the delivery of goods and services to the community, wherever they may be. The final report of the COAG review of pharmacy regulation makes it clear how changes to regulation can improve services to communities "in the bush". It explains how current ownership regulations and PBS location rules work against the benefit of people living in small country towns. It goes to some length to explain how the present ownership regulations work against having a competitive environment for consumers to be able to decide for themselves the profile of the pharmacy which they would prefer to patronise. It also accuses the industry to be behind the times when it comes to innovation and experimentation with alternative models of practice. This report (in the year 2000) is unlikely to bring about any immediate change as the political climate is not right, and this fact is well known to pharmacy leaders. The Federal Government is obsessed with bringing in the GST with the least disruption. State/Territory Governments, while maybe interested in the process of change through National Competition Policy incentives, are also aware the changes needed to have a competitive retail pharmacy marketplace do not happen suddenly. They must be carefully planned in conjunction with measured changes in the PBS. With pharmacies relying on the PBS for 65 per cent of turnover, rapid change could mean the closing down of access, and this is not being responsible. Given these factors it could easily be argued why worry? The answer is simple. While the report may not have any immediate impact, the arguments contained will not go away even with the passage of time. In fact they may become stronger in the near future if no action or attention is given to the reasons why certain assertions were made towards the retail pharmacy industry. The allegation that NCP will give an easier access to larger retailers to dominate a marketplace, is neglecting what the situation would be without NCP processes. Given the need for NCP reviews to be transparent, and encourage submissions from the private sector and community groups. It could be that the path for change would be more sympathetic to local needs in a social and employment context. Globalisation of industry was well in progress before NCP, as was the growth of information technology. At least through a well-defined process NCP has the opportunity to assist with planned change rather than one which is purely economically driven. Pharmacy in the retail sector could do well to ask itself some questions as to the lessons which can be learnt from the NCP review of pharmacy regulation. This if done in a transparent manner, and open to public scrutiny and support, would position the profession well in the event of further examination of anticompetitive forces within the industry structure. Questions needing an answer surround some of the following: Why is there a "sameness" associated with the pharmacy profile around Australia? And is it in the best public benefit? How it is that a pharmacy in Gove or Cooktown receives the same remuneration for dispensing as the pharmacy in the inner suburbs of a city? Why the consumer cannot have a choice between counselling or no counselling, and decide whether they are prepared to pay a premium? How the PBS can be sustained with the granting of a PBS approval being the expected "norm" of all pharmacies. How extra capital can be attracted to the industry to try out different models of innovative practice? How long the PBS can continue to contribute 65 per cent of retail turnover with such a low return on capital investment. Is there a public benefit from Pharmacy Boards meddling in commercial structures and decisions. If professionalism is so essential in pharmacy practice, how is it that renewal of registration carries no competency assessment? If registration is so important, how long before it is essential to have a National register, rather a State/Territory separate system? And so the questions could continue. What to do? The first essential element is for pharmacy organisations to have a proactive stance towards to change. It is not too late, given the early initial reprieve from the COAG review, to be a part of planning the change process and not just reacting to the moves of governments. All pharmacists in retail practice could do well to look back on how the practice was when they entered from University, and how much it has changed. The result will be telling, as there is not very much evident change. At a time when health service delivery is moving forward at a great rate of change, pharmacy is stagnant. In 10 years time it could be the profession nobody wants if it does not start to carve out its own place in the professional team. Ask yourself what you are doing that technology cannot? You may find the answer worrying, depending on your attitude to future generations of pharmacists. Be competitive; make sure others who will decide how important they think you are want you. The "government" is certainly there to help, but not to provide all the time. One final question. What other health professional is in such a protected environment as the pharmacist? There are not many. Pharmacy has to earn the privileges bestowed on it. It is not a right without responsibility.

Back to Top

E-COMMERCE STATISTICS
In 1999, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 50% of Australian households owned a computer. This is 3% higher than in 1998. During this same period 25% of Australian households were online, which is a rise of 6% over the previous year. It was also found that people utilised the Internet equally at home or at work. With the rate of Internet connection doubling the rate of computer purchases, it only takes some simple arithmetic to see that in a short timespan, a majority of householders will own a computer, and be actively using it to access the Internet. Fuelling the expansion of Internet usage IS the Federal and State government decision, to only transact business by e-commerce exclusively, by the end of 2001. Nearly $9 billion is spent annually by government on supply items, and organisations and persons wishing to deal with governments will have to be online, or risk losing contracts. The savings to government are estimated at around 10% of purchasing costs. Many people are currently responding to government statutory requirements by applying for their Australian Business Numbers via the Internet. The Australian Securities and Investment Commission encourages you to do your annual company return in a similar fashion (even uses the same ABN). Banks are allocating more resources for Internet banking and the biggest problem of security appears to have been resolved. Bank fees are also cheaper online (but margins for the bank improve with minimal need for employees). In a surprise move, Ford Australia has offered its 5100 employees a personal computer, software, a printer and Internet access, all for $5 per month. The company's aim is to give employees an understanding of how consumers think and act online, at a time when car buying decisions are continuing to increase online. The prediction is that more than 30% of new car dealers could disappear, as the customer gets closer to the manufacturer. This will force the remaining dealers to consolidate and innovate if they are to survive. Various e-commerce platforms are planned for whole industries. The office supply industry is hoping to pilot such a platform to be accessible by small or medium size business. To date eleven major suppliers have assembled to transform their distribution arrangements. Similar activities are planned for newsagents, road transport, automotive and pharmaceutical industries. It is estimated that 50% of supply chain activity is currently done by fax and 40% by phone. This is intended to be replaced 100% by Internet e-commerce connection. Recently, I was asked how much I used my e-mail three years ago compared with current usage. My response was that I didn't even have e-mail until early in 1999. I was then asked what volume of purchases I made by Internet currently. My response was that I had only made a few modest purchases to date, and that was mostly computer software. The final question was; "How much in $ value do you anticipate purchasing by Internet three years from now?" I pose the same question to readers of this publication. With the rapid reorganisation of business-to-business e-commerce and the major investments currently being made in business-to-consumer marketing, do you really believe that you can stand outside of this amazing phenomenon? Savvy people will be preparing now for this new wave, or suffer the fate that new car dealers appear to have in store. Consolidate and innovate seems to be the message for survival.

Back to Top


SUPERMARKET SHUDDER
In 1999 a little known German supermarket chain called Aldi announced that it was going to set up shop in Australia. The then group managing director of Woolworths, Mr Reg Clairs, made the pronouncement that Aldi could not be successful in Australia given the strength of Coles, Franklins and Woolworths and their grip on the supplier trade. It is now early in 2000 and Aldi have purchased a modest number of sites in metropolitan Sydney. At a recent Queensland Grocery Industry Association luncheon. Mr Clairs reversed his earlier statement and sounded alarm bells for the supermarket industry. It appears that globalisation has become a reality in the past 12 months and what were regional players, have now become completely global. Mr Clairs said,"Our supply base will be in tatters and our retailers stranded." He further stated,"I was wrong.Over the past months I have had exposure to some of the thinking now starting to emerge as the concept of globalisation hits home. The strategies being put into place to support globalisation of retailing are sinister. It is my guess now that Aldi will be successful through a modus operandi unknown to us in Australia." The marketing strategy of Aldi seem to be to carry approximately 800 basic private label processed food items, negotiated globally from countries providing the cheapest labour source. Realisation is beginning to occur that these products will be sold at 20-30% under existing Australian retail prices, and Woolworths, Coles and Franklins will not initially be able to meet them. Panic is setting in. Worse is to follow. Tesco, Casino, Metro, Carrefour and Macro are five other global players looking to move into the Australian and Asian marketplace and this year, 100 new supermarkets are planned to be opened throughout Asia. The problem for Australia is that these global giants completely bypass local growers and producers, also local manufacturers, and provide damaging competition to retailers. One may think that this is poetic justice for one of Pharmacy's most predatory competitors, but the implications for Australia's economy are enormous in respect of loss of employment in all sectors, with small and large businesses put under pressure. And don't think that it will not happen in pharmacy. For the moment, we have a reprieve, and a five to seven year window of opportunity to restructure ourselves and ensure there are some larger players capable of becoming global in their own right or in collaboration with strong partners. Should pharmacy lose the ownership battle down the track, the pressure to let global operators in will be enormous, given that the food industry will have already been globalised. Pharmacy manufacturers have globalised themselves with a spate of amalgamations and they are capable of exerting enormous economic pressure on a country like Australia. Some Australian wholesalers have positioned themselves to be potential global players and have recently gone to the market to recruit capital. Whatever happens, we are certain to undergo rapid change, most beyond our control. Pharmacists should be looking now toward what they think they can control an plan some strategic alliances that will build strength.

Back to Top

COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES: ITEMS OF INTEREST
On the 31st March next, the NSW Therapeutic Assessment Group will be holding a one day seminar at the Centenary Lecture Theatre at the Royal North Shore Hospital. The title of the seminar is "Complementary Therapies: Fact, Fictions and the Future" It is designed for health professionals and is in recognition that with the widespread use of alternate therapies, mainstream clinicians must now consider these therapies as part of their patient's total management. Obviously, this will be extremely difficult for some orthodox clinicians, who have made a practice of belittling people who dared to follow such practices. Patients, responding to this attitude, simply don't tell their doctor anything. Alternatively, they visit their doctor's surgery, armed with information downloaded from the Internet, and systematically embarrass their doctor, who simply does not know or understand. The TAG seminar is an admission by the NSW hospital system that it must now come to terms with alternate therapies and safely incorporate them within their protocols. Those pharmacists who took the time to gain qualifications in this area, particularly the Advanced Diploma of Clinical Nutrition, may now find their services urgently needed. An opportunity exists here for a potential "gatekeeper" role for pharmacists, even moving towards collaborative prescribing. In America, pharmacists have forged a constructive partnership with dietitians to be recognised as the primary information source for complementary therapies. Initial studies are showing that simple therapies that are low in cost, are very effective and are preventing rebound hospital admissions. Large dollar savings are also showing up in hospital budgets. Once this is known to the Australian hospital system, opportunities will appear for pharmacists if they are alert to identify them and are qualified to manage them.

Homoeopathy made news recently, when some scientific investigation revealed that there is a rationale for why it works. In homoeopathic circles, the more you dilute a drug, the more potent it becomes. Continual dilutions with water, accompanied by vigorous shaking is a process known as "successing". After repeating this process many times, the water is poured on to sugar pellets and administered. This intense diluting means that it is possible the drug is untraceable in its final form. In a different field involving car engine cleaners, researchers have found that water molecules, random in their normal state, begin to form a cluster when a substance is added to water and vigorously shaken (the exact process that homoeopaths use to create their medicine). It seems that every substance exerts its own unique influence on the water, so each cluster shape and configuration is unique to the substance added. With each dilution and shaking, the clusters grow bigger and stronger. This water (called "potentised" by homoeopaths) is considered as "structured water" because water molecules have taken on a shape influenced by the original substance. The clusters start to assume a form that mimics the structure of the original substance itself, and even though the original chemical is undetectable, its image is assumed by the water. Thus the original chemical becomes irrelevant. Up until now, everybody has been happy with the principles of homoeopathy (the body can, and knows how to heal itself) but have stumbled over the concept of greater dilution equals greater potency. It has been shown to work- and can now be claimed to be "evidenced based medicine".

Back to Top

INTERNET PREPARATION
At Computachem Services we believe in being well prepared for any major change in the market place and that this currently means to be Internet prepared. We have a strategy to build sites in a logical progression.........Business to Business (B2B), followed by Business to Consumer (B2C) an then on to Business to Government (B2G). For the moment we are offering B2B sites free of charge to pharmacists as a means of establishing and using a web connection. Once this is up and running we will then construct a B2C site, but not just by itself. A B2C site needs a planned marketing strategy to make it work, otherwise it will just sit there unused. The principles of selling on the net apply even more stringently than the "bricks and mortar" approach i.e product, price and where you get it plus how and when you get it. Many sites are crowding out products with free information, creating congestion and pages that load slowly. I urge you all to study the simplicity of the Pharmacy Direct site and ponder what the elements were that made it a success. Please visit our web site at http://www.computachem.com.au to see what else we do. We have currently published a new journal-type publication titled "Australian Consultant" which you may like to subscribe to. The first edition is posted on our web site. It has been produced in the belief that the clinical elements of the Pharmacy Profession need to be defined and marketed as never before, as global events are played out and Internet marketing takes hold. It may be all that we are left with. If you have any colleagues who would like to receive this free newsletter, please pass on the e-mail address: neilj@computachem.com.au

More next month.

* Don't forget to advise of any change in your e-mail address so that your subscription may be continued without interruption.
* You are invited to visit the Computachem web site at http://www.computachem.com.au .
* Any interested persons who would like to receive this free newsletter on their desktop each fortnight, please send a single word e-mail "Subscribe" to neilj@computachem.com.au

* Looking for an organised reference site for medical or other references? Why not try (and bookmark) the Computachem Interweb Directory , for an easily accessed range of medical and pharmacy links, plus a host of pharmacy relevant links. The directory also contains a very fast search engine for Internet enquiries

Back to Top

Home | Main Article Index