Pretty
much the same rule could be cast over the Pharmacy profession
I suspect.
Good to be busy, but are we useful?
Good
to see full employment.
Good
to see Pharmacists striving to feel useful by taking up Consultancies,
Compounding, Education and other activities that sets them apart
from the rest.
Time
too, to look backwards to what was.
Some
good. Some very bad.
I
can't believe two years of my Apprenticeship was spent washing
bottles.
Better to pay an Apprentice's wage ($6 a week!) than to buy new
bottles.
Shame.
Indexing
the prescription book daily so that records could be retrieved.
No computers then.
But
no Methadone dispensing either.
Did we have substance abuse then?
What
was the mentality that led to sending prescriptions out without
identification?
An example: Chloromycetin eye ointment tubes would be soaked in
Ether/Acetone to remove the label so that a dispensing label "The
Eye Ointment" could be afixed.
Often residual solvent remained under the cap to irritate the
eye upon first use.
We all accepted it as standard practice and that is why today
I won't accept anything on face value but examine it's worth.
The truth test.
I
am now coming up to my fifth decade in Pharmacy.
Retirement?
Not yet, if at all.
I'm having too much fun.
|
Enjoy
your Christmas break with the family, and start the New
Year with a fresh outlook.
From
Stephen Rogers, Perth.
|
|