What
I have found astonishing is the amount of people for whom this system
is designed to help blatantly abusing is. And, what is more, the
number of pharmacists who are more than happy to see this abuse
continue.
The frustrating
and time consuming explanation to the patient that they cannot
have their blood pressure medication that they only had dispensed
three days ago, would work absolutely brilliantly if the prescription
wasn't presented back three days later (having been filled by
another pharmacy) for re-dispensing.
Add to that
the numerous people who are "going away for two or three
months".
I find it especially comical when the quizzed patient isn't entirely
sure of where they are going, and even more entertaining if they
mention that it is to a subtropical area.
Usually, by the time they are counseled on malarial prophylaxis,
and you have explained why they really need to purchase two or
three packets of Imodium and Gastrolyte, they come clean.
It is interesting
to hear the push for actual prices of medications to be printed
onto the labels.
But since the government seems to rightly and wrongly owe so many
people so much, I question its likely success.
I wonder if Mrs Smith is going to be angry that the government
is paying an extra twenty dollars per week to keep Mrs Jones alive,
even though she cheats at bridge and has a dog that barks all
night.
Furthermore, if the doctor changes a patients medication from
an ACE Inhibitor to a Diuretic, what will the patients reaction
be?
Will they be upset at time of dispensing that they have gone from
an expensive medication to a relatively cheap one?
Anyone who has ever tried to explain to a patient that two cross-licensed
products come from the same factory floor, only to receive the
answer of "I don't want the cheapies, I want the better one"
will know the difficulties that we will face with these people.
The Health
Insurance Commission has done relatively well in December 2002
with its advertisements reminding pharmacists not to dispense
another prescription if it is not due, and GPs not to write another
prescription for an item if it is not due.
Perhaps for
2003, this line of advertising can be directed to consumers.
|