I am happy
to report now that I am in a position to do something towards
a changed culture in managing the QUM programs in the Division
of General Practice in the later part of my career as a pharmacist.
To start with there is now an awareness of the pitfalls of neglecting
QUM issues in the community and perhaps a greater fervor in addressing
the costs to the community by improving quality use of medicine.
QUM was not even thought of when I accepted and grudgingly dispensed
the myriad potions and pills in those days.
Older pharmacists will remember the buckets - literally- of potions
we mixed up.
Some made from grizzled up roots and the orange peel from our
lunch!
And then the cough mixtures - enough to make you choke!
And on and on it went - corks in small eye drop bottles - never
sterilised and gooy ointments and smelly liniments.
And to top it off there was a preserved mystery in all of this
as each was labeled with its generic description of "The
Mixture" or "The Ointment" or "The Tablets".
No wonder the poor patient asked for one of each - there was no
knowing which was which and I bet they knew very little of what
each was for.
Ignorance was bliss and trust in the doctor next to godliness.
Funny that so little of this medication is known or used today?
How much of what is prescribed and dispensed today will be with
us in another 30 years?
Do you ever wonder?
When I visited a museum with a lovely old pharmacy in Benalla
a few weeks ago I was transported back to a romantic and fascinating
time - a bit before my time - but it bought back memories of the
pharmacy I began my career in and I have to admit there was a
certain pleasure in it all that is lost these days.
I question if we have progressed when I hear reports of pharmacists
'dispensing' up to 400 scripts a day.
At least they are named I suppose and the customer who is paying
just gets what they want.
Presumably they know about their medicines although with 400 scripts
to do in a day I can imagine they are not counseled much.
A QUM issue is then the pressure to dispense.
Also to prescribe.
Many patients still present to their equally busy GPs with what
amounts to shopping list of scripts they require.
And then there are the patient's expectations of what they want
to take.
Antibiotics for the sore throat they are suffering or the child's
sore ear.
It takes time to educate and convince a patient of a perceived
need that can be addressed in another more appropriate, evidence-based
manner.
It takes time to persuade the young man with a high cholesterol
that a change in diet and exercise will reduce his low risk of
a cardio vascular event to an even lower risk and avoid his initiation
of a lipid lowering drug for life with its attendant unknown long
term safety or the minor side effects that will change his mind
in 6 months down the track anyway.
A QUM issue is then for an increase in time to talk to patients
at the prescribing time and also at the dispensing time.
Time is money, so QUM costs.
Are these costs outweighed by the benefits?
To make QUM decisions the GP must be informed by the most evidence
based data on the condition prescribed for.
The National Prescribing Service (NPS) through the Divisions of
General Practice across the country provides a program of Practice
visits to GPs to inform them of this independent evidence.
It is most satisfying as one of these GP visitors to engage in
a one to one conversation with a GP offering well researched materials
and patient 'life scripts' that will modify prescribing behaviors
towards a QUM agenda.
|