The
war usage was very interesting.
Wristbands containing RFID technology were strapped to wounded as
they were brought to a central location (known as "Hospital
Three"-a nine acre 116 bed facility in southern Iraq).
This system replaced cardboard tags and a central whiteboard.
The advantage of the RFID tag is that it reduces human manual systems
error, because data can be added or altered to the electronic tag
as patients move through various facilities.
A hand held universal reader can retrieve data at any time.
By this means, patients can be located automatically, and their
condition status read by a wide range of health professionals.
The system seems destined to find its way into hospitals for patient
admissions, and the sub systems that may be found in a health environment,
including pharmacy.
A basic RFID
system consists of three components:
* An antenna
or coil.
* A
transceiver (with decoder)
* A
transponder (RF tag) electronically programmed with unique information.
The antenna
emits radio signals to activate the tag, and can both read and
write data to it.
Antennas are the conduit between the tag and the transceiver,
which controls the system's data acquisition and communications.
Antennas can be very large or very small, depending on the application,
and they can be built into areas such as door frames, toll booths,
store equipment, pallets etc.
The electromagnetic field produced by an antenna can be constantly
present when multiple tags are continuously expected (as in a
car toll booth), or the field can be activated by a sensor device
if constant interrogation is not required.
Often, the antenna is packaged with the transceiver and decoder
in a handheld or fixed mounted device to become a reader. The
reader emits radio waves in ranges of 2cm to 30 metres (or more)
depending on configuration and requirements.
As the RFID tag passes through the electromagnetic zone, it detects
the reader's activation signal. The reader decodes the data encoded
in the tag's integrated circuit (silicon chip) and the data is
passed to the host computer for processing.
Tags come
in two types- active and passive.
Active tags are those with their own power source, while passive
tags operate from power generated by the reader.
Passive tags are much lighter, less expensive and have a virtually
unlimited lifetime.
The trade-off between the two types is that the read range of
a passive tag is much shorter than an active tag, and generally
requires a higher powered reader.
RFID systems are also distinguished by their frequency range.
Low frequency systems have a shorter reading range with lower
system costs (used for security access and asset tracking), while
high frequency systems have long reading ranges (greater than
30 metres) coupled with higher reading speeds.
High frequency systems are more expensive and are used for railroad
tracking and automated car toll collection systems.
The great advantage of all types of RFID systems is the non-contact,
non-line-of-sight nature of the technology.
Tags can be read through snow, fog, ice, paint, crusted grime,
and other visually challenging environments, where bar-codes or
other optical-read technologies would be useless.
The speed of an RFID system, under difficult conditions, is measured
in milliseconds.
Coupled with a read/write capability, RFID looks set to become
one of the more flexible technologies on offer, with a wide variety
of applications.
While it is admittedly more costly than bar-code technology it
has the capacity to increase larger memory capacities, wider reading
ranges and faster processing.
It is not likely that an RF tag will ever be as cost effective
as a bar-code in all applications.
Opinion is steadily changing in this area however, as major
global companies (particularly retailers) see benefit in expanding
RFID technology through their entire environments, in a way that
interfaces with all existing systems.
Meanwhile,
there is a collaborative venture involving RDIF technology and
bar-code technology, known as GTAG which combines radio tags with
UCC.EAN bar-codes, that will ultimately allow the best of both
technologies to emerge.
If the world's
largest retailer tagged products at the item level, approximately
seven million terabytes of information would be created in a single
day.
This is more than any network system is currently capable of handling.
Technology, particularly hardware, would have to reduce substantially
in cost, before radio tags became a possibility at the retail
item level.
However, global retailers are measuring the speed of gaining competitive
and strategic value against the base cost of RFID technologies,
and see a host of other cost reductions (including reduced levels
of employees) as a real offset gain.
This confluence
of ideas and related arguments have come together as a retail experiment
in Germany.
An alliance
of major companies has formed to provide and apply IT solutions
for retail environments.
A German group of supermarkets called Metro is driving an initiative
they call "The Extra Future Store". Alliance partners
include NCR, IBM, SAP (the world's third largest software company)
and Intel.
Basically
RFID's are utilised to integrate with a range of electronic equipment
and systems across a retail store, that includes automatic self
checkout machines, electronic shelf labeling, and intelligent
weighing machines that can identify and weigh fruit and vegetables.
While these
technologies exist independently in stores throughout the world,
Metro is the first retailer to bring them all together under one
roof in its test store located at Rheinberg, Germany.
RFID is used to track goods at the carton outer or pallet level,
but for this particular experiment, tags will not be used at the
individual item level. Bar-codes will take over at the checkout.
However, radio
tagging of products offers some exciting possibilities that could
include instant stock valuations at any given time, instant shelf
counts of stock for ordering purposes, and the elimination of
checkout queues, as prices can be tabulated on a cash register
instantaneously.
Predictive ordering and inventory management systems that rely
on product demand information to set shelf holdings and generate
orders, would have the majority of their operational problems
solved, by utilising RFID.
The electronic
shelf pricing system (provided by NCR) will enable updating of
all shelf prices from a single back-office location, which integrates
with point-of-sale hardware.
This means that shelf prices will always agree with checkout prices.
The checkout system will also be provided by NCR (called Fastlane-which
has previously been reviewed in this publication), and this system
eliminates a checkout employee, as it is totally operated by the
customer.
Fastlane systems are already operational in some major retail
stores in Australia.
The intelligent
weighing machine is an IBM development which can actually differentiate
between fruits and vegetables, and print out a price sticker.
SAP software and Intel chip makers are looking after the overall
technology.
No doubt the start made in Metro will be used to develop RF tags
down to an individual level, but this could be a five to ten year
timeframe.
Metro has
more than 2300 stores in 26 countries and is Germany's leading
retailer.
They are expecting tremendous efficiency and big savings across
the supply chain.
Customers,
it is claimed, will have an enhanced experience in such an environment,
because their needs are being looked at through programmable shopping
carts.
Here a touchscreen can (after a card swipe by the customer), deliver
information on best offers according to the individual customer
profile. Customers can call up a store map and get directions
as to where they can find individual products.
Even sophisticated Loyalty Club schemes can be managed at this
level!
Apart from the main players above, there are numerous other alliance
partners required to ensure the system is sustainable. The objective
for the project is to develop uniform standards for retailing
that can be implemented across the world.
There is also
no doubt that Australia's health delivery systems, including community
pharmacy, will be caught up in the push to expand applications
for RDIF technology.
The point at which any participant, such as a community pharmacist,
can enter into this technology advance, depends on the state of
development of surrounding organisations, that includes hospitals,
wholesalers, manufacturers and major service providers, as well
as government agencies.
The cost of investing in new technologies has to be weighed against
strategic advantages, and these decisions are increased in cost,
if the wrong suite of technologies is selected initially.
Unfortunately, unless small pharmacies can form an effective alliance
through an organisation such as the Pharmacy Guild, they will
forever lag behind.
It is estimated currently that the difference in IT development
between say, Woolworths, and the average community pharmacy in
Australia, is approximately ten years.
The Pharmacy Guild has not made an impact, and the gap is widening.
This means that unless pharmacies are allowed to incorporate and
grow in size, they will never catch up and be able to compete.
The only alternative is to remain as a "niche" in an
ever diminishing market, vulnerable to all who are in a position
to manipulate (government and major retailers).
The retail
model being developed above, should be revisited in about two
years time to see what has been successfully proven.
|