EDITORIAL
i2P E-Magazine
started life as a modest newsletter in the year 2000 when the editor
found that he had shared concerns with other pharmacists as to where
Australian pharmacy was heading.
At that time the Wilkinson Review into pharmacy was nearing completion,
and there was a general uneasiness that the economic rationalists advising
government were intent on tearing the fabric of pharmacy down, which
appeared to be little more than an economic experiment that could destroy
pharmacy completely.
Pharmacists in Australia are very competitive among themselves and constantly
criticise their leadership and the organisations that represent their
interests.
This is normal and healthy, and is much like an extended family-we can
punch each other on the nose, but woe betide any intruder outside of
the "family" that tries to do the same thing.
When pharmacists share a common concern, they usually unite, but still
reserve the right to retain their individualism.
Since Australia's beginnings from the First Fleet in 1788, Australian
pharmacy has had to fend off many predators endeavouring to control
the sucessful business model it has built up. This currently includes
Woolworths/Priceline etc barking at the fringes, plus the global entrants
circling around to gobble up each and every opportunity that presents
itself.
The model of pharmacy has been been a personal one and has had to grapple
with many governments over ownership issues, location issues and the
nationalisation of prescription medicines through the Pharmaceutical
Benefits Scheme (PBS), and now perhaps the internationalisation of the
PBS through a free trade agreement with the US.
There is nothing free about that type of negotiation, which I personally
believe to be an attack on the democratic freedoms that Australians
have come to enjoy and know as the "Australian way of life".
Since these
attacks started through global entrants, i2P has been at the forefront
identifying the threats and opportunities, and endeavouring to support
strategies to allow pharmacy to remain strong and healthy and Australian.
It is also apparent that the individualism of pharmacists is being expressed
by their being prepared to jump in head first and associate as a Woolworths
pharmacist or a Priceline pharmacist or whatever other flavour comes
along.
These are people who see weaknesses in the current model of pharmacy,
and are prepared to go out and develop new and different niches, and
take the associated risks.
It is also
a crticism of the leadership, who now needs to unify and fight off challenges
in a united fashion. In this, the Pharmacy Guild of Australia, have
stubbornly refused to come to grips with the 21st century and realise
that things have to be done differently.
The rebels will return to the fold when a better model of pharmacy is
allowed to evolve.
Not a lot needs to be changed, but those changes will need a revolution
inside the PGA because it will have to totally change the way it looks
at and services its members.
And individual members have to now realise that by wishing to remain
small in structure they are leaving themselves weak and open to attack.
i2P is
privileged to carry some very original research prepared by Professor
Con Berbatis of Curtin University specifically on supermarkets and pharmacy,
both within and without of Australia.
You are recommended to read this material and use it to assist in future
decision making, because there will now be little room for error.
Pharmacists
can draw little comfort from legislative changes e.g in the Australian
Capital Territory, where the Pharmacy Act has suddenly assumed a very
protective role.
This is good short-term strategy, but it remains just that.
Governments will eventually lose patience if pharmacy does not get out
there and help itself.
Neil
Johnston
October 2003
BACK
TO FRONT PAGE
|