I
know that this publication has been critical in the past, of the
Pharmacy Guild and the Pharmaceutical Society for not having an
IT strategy in place to give pharmacists a guide for their future
planning.
I know that this publication has also been critical of the attitude
taken towards some Internet pharmacy operators by the Guild, in
particular.
I know there have been a number of failed and expensive attempts
by the Pharmacy Guild to bridge the gaps.
The
real question is "Have we moved forward as a profession with
the announcement of a new Guild IT rollout?". The concensus
of opinion with some at i2P is that the Pharmacy Guild may finally
have the basis of a good IT plan. If it simply provides the support
mechanisms for each pharmacy's IT strategy without seeking to
dominate or control the process, then it will succeed. If not,
then it will lose support and individuals will go their own way.
With
prescription dispensing numbers out of control, coupled with diminishing
monetary returns, a sensible pharmacist would have to begin to
find a solution..and quickly. Of course, you could refuse to dispense
prescriptions and find an alternative mix and balance of services,
or you could continue to regard dispensing as "core business"
and look at alternative methods.
The
solution that I propose is to retain core business and set up
an Internet pharmacy, with a difference.
The
Internet pharmacy I propose is not one that is necessarily advertised
to the general public (but it could be, if desired). I further
propose that this Internet pharmacy be owned by all the existing
community pharmacists within a town/region and provide a dispensing
service for all member pharmacies.
That is, you completely outsource the assembly component of your
dispensing.
Of course, some of the rules would have to be changed, particularly
the one where the HIC currently prohibits agency type dispensing.
It may be necessary for some of the members to be able to have
a fiduciary interest in more than the legislated number of pharmacies
allowed within the state of operation (depending on existing circumstances),
and it may be necessary to move forward the proposed legislation
relating to incorporation, so that efficient business structures
can be put in place, to encourage such mergers.
This is not "rocket science", just a commonsense relaxation
of rules that have suddenly become outdated.
This
new type of Internet pharmacy would need to accommodate each member
pharmacy online, and prescription details would be delivered online
from three sources, via each member pharmacy:
* Direct from a doctor's surgery on patient instruction.
* From a patient "smart card" presented at a member
pharmacy.
*
From manual input by member pharmacy staff (this type of input
would all but disappear over time).
Completed
prescriptions would be returned to the member pharmacy, or delivered
direct to the patient, depending on circumstances.
Of
course, the "while you wait" dispensing offer within
each community pharmacy has to completely disappear (it never
was a sensible or valid service to offer in the first place).
In its place, you would have to develop an appointment schedule
so that a patient would know exactly when to return, and if counselling
has to be built in, then you now have the time to do it.
Counselling could be done at the initial point of contact with
a patient, and home delivery arranged, if there is urgency or
incapacity connected to the prescription.
In other words, a complete reversal of your current procedures.
Because
patients simply cannot walk out on you if you do not provide immediate
supply (all other pharmacies close by are assumed to be part of
the scheme) you are gradually able to induce a permanent culture
change in regard to patient expectations. Along the way, and within
this process, you are developing time to deliver more of the cognitive
services you really want to provide.
The
centre-piece of the Internet pharmacy has to be an automated dispensing
machine and an efficient courier service. The courier service
could comprise of a locally owned service (even owned by the Internet
Pharmacy) integrated with a national courier and Australia Post.
Automated
dispensing machines have been slowly evolving over the last 10
years or so, and have arisen from a combination of mechanical
vending machines and robotic technology. Early adaptations for
pharmacy use have been moderately successful and there have been
limitations.
The most publicised versions, of course, originated in the US.
But the most efficient versions have been quietly developed in
Europe, particularly Germany.
One product in particular, the Rowa Speedcase, has recently shot
to prominence, and has had a successful installation in St Thomas's
Hospital, London.
It was conceived by a German pharmacist located in a rural area,
who needed extra space to provide counselling and clinical services
to the local community. The pharmacist identified an industrial
robotic picking device, which was successfully connected to his
dispensing computer. He set the device up in the basement of the
pharmacy building, and so was born the Rowa Speedcase, which has
been continually refined and is now utilised for complex hospital
dispensing solutions.
The system is easily networked among a number of computer terminals.
Physically,
the Rowa Speedcase can be adapted to fit most locations.
In the St Thomas location, it utilises two identical machines,
side-by-side, and working in tandem with each other. Each machine
has two sides of 3 metre high floor-to-ceiling shelves, which
are adjusted to eliminate any space between stock and the shelf
above (no room is required for a hand selection). The combination
of high density shelf stacking and a shelf system that extends
beyond the regulation 1.6 metres high, creates a significant space
saving.
A
robotic arm is located within each machine.
There are two input points for filling the machine, two output
points for delivering picked items, and two main computer terminals.
The system is simply a mini-warehouse.
To put items into the system, a barcode on each pack is scanned.
This enables the robot to identify product, brand, strength and
pack quantity. The product is then placed on a conveyor belt leading
to one of the input points of the system, and the machine then
electronically measures the dimensions of the pack. The robotic
arm picks up the pack and randomly allocates a space for it on
a shelf which has the correct dimension for that pack, and then
stores it on that shelf. The computer remembers exactly where
it has placed the various items and different items can be input
simultaneously on the conveyor.
To create maximum efficiency, the machine is filled at night,
after which the robot automatically sorts the products, so that
high velocity products are located to the front of the machine.
Velocity location improves the speed of picking a product by the
robot, during an actual dispensing.
No special skills are required for staff loading the machine.
Orders from suppliers are simply unpacked, scanned, and placed
on the conveyor belt. The machine does the rest, and in the process,
eliminates the possibility of human error.
When
dispensing from one of the computer terminals, a product is selected
through the computer (after an input of all patient details and
instructions for use). The robot identifies the product and its
location by barcode, transports it to the output conveyor belt,
which send it to an appropriate chute in the dispensing area.
The chute selection is determined by the computer, which in the
St Thomas location is one of three (inpatient dispensing chute,
outpatient dispensing chute, discharge dispensing chute). The
robot also makes its selection according to datecode and picks
the shortest expiry date.
The whole process, after computer input, takes less than 15 seconds
per item delivered to a chute, where the product is labelled and
checked by a pharmacist. This checking point is crucial, for the
one process where human error can occur is when prescription details
are input. Other forms of input may also be flawed if utilised
in the Internet pharmacy I have described (smartcard or doctor
online), so the necessity for a thorough check before a label
is applied, requires a pharmacist with appropriate experience.
The
maximum capacity for the Speedcase installed in the St Thomas
location has not yet been determined, but is estimated at 20,000
packs (plus or minus depending on pack size mix).
The system will handle most items (including injections, inhalers,
eye drops).
Legal restriction preclude the loading of Schedule Eight drugs
and unlicensed drugs.
Items that exceed a certain weight or volume also have to be excluded.
The
installation at St Thomas's has reduced storage space requirements
and increased workspace in the dispensary. It has eliminated errors
in the manual process of putting stock received away on shelves
and in picking stock items for dispensing. Order processing time
has been cut by 20 percent and has reduced the need for skilled
staff. The goal of releasing pharmacists for patient education
has also been realised, but more "fine tuning" of the
system is still required to obtain maximum benefits.
The system has allowed a redesign of the pharmacy with a more
aesthetic appeal, which allows more natural daylight into the
area. A tracking system for patients and completed prescription,
has also been developed, and this could possibly be adapted for
the Internet pharmacy system I have described above, in collaboration
with the selected courier service.
It is not beyond the realms of imagination that a wholesaler could
be plugged into the system to deliver a stream of automated "just-in-time"
orders to fill the machine. If this means one delivery point for
one Internet pharmacy servicing a number of individual pharmacies
in a given town/region, this must represent a scale of economy
that would attract most wholesalers.
If not, it represents an opportunity for a group of like-minded
Internet pharmacies to collate their "virtual orders"
and go straight to a manufacturer, who packs the orders (in shrinkproof
plastic wraps in original outers), and arranges the various drop-off
points for each Internet pharmacy, through an order fulfillment
operator (utilising barcode technology on the outside of each
order to control the process).
Since
the introduction of the Rowa Speedcase at St Thomas Hospital,
two other UK locations have installed automated dispensing, one
of which has won a "Healthcare Information Technology Effectiveness
Award" (The Wirral Hospitals NHS Trust). The award was given
for the best example of technological innovation and the overall
award for the best use of IT in the health service.
So
I am not describing "pie in the sky" systems or applications.
They actually exist.
It will only take an alliance with all the players to make it
work, but the impetus should come from community pharmacists.
The workload is intense now, and it will temporarily increase
with the introduction of Internet systems, but it does allow a
vision to develop that pharmacy can be the creative and interesting
profession it once was, and still has the capacity to be.
Alliances of interested parties need to be established, and the
Pharmacy Guild has the opportunity to be a key cordinator for
the process, as it develops its IT strategy rollout.
Perhaps some of that government grant could be dedicated to this
kind of B2B process, and given a preference over retail e-commerce
development, which, while important, would represent the lesser
of the two needs initially.
Please
check out the following links to my previous articles (the publication
order reads from bottom to top):
*
Dealing With the CTD120P Syndrome
(Is it Really Close the Door After 120 Prescriptions?)
*
Innovative Workplaces
*
The Consultant Pharmacist Model..Value Adding to Services
*
The Consultant Pharmacist Model..Developing Services
*
The Consultant Pharmacist Model...Integrating the People
*
The Consultant Pharmacist Model..Extending the Boundaries
*
The Consultant Pharmacist Model..Bridging the Gaps
* PRACTICE MANAGEMENT A Model for Consultant Pharmacists
* MANAGEMENT Improving Team Performances
Back
to Frontpage
|