Talking to the organisers of the session after we had finished
I was quite taken aback by the amazement of these non pharmacist
public servants in the amount of private information freely given
to me.
This brought home to me just how strong is the trust we pharmacist
engender in the general populace, despite the constant sniping
our profession suffers at the hands of members of those "highly
trusted" groups, namely journalists and politicians!
Trust has the potential to become our profession's greatest weapon
it its fight for survival. The people trust us way above all other
professions (except nursing) so why do we have to continually
fight off the "powers of darkness"?
Will we be able to harness the people's trust or will it be merely
a fleeting moment as pharmacy, in its present state, is submerged
under the weight of big business and government legislation?
How the profession maintains its standing with patients/customers/clients
remains a mystery, given that pharmacists are consistently made
the "fall guys" for changes to the PBS.
This weekend I saw the first advertisements about the need for
patients to show pharmacists their Medicare cards from May 1 to
get subsidised drugs, a whole ten days before it comes into effect!
Pharmacists have been trying to get this message across for over
twelve months, often to the annoyance of their clients - all for
ten cents per script!
I'm sorry but I do not consider it the role of community pharmacists
to explain government policy, even for the princely sum of ten
cents per script.
As I have written previously, thank goodness May 1 is not a Saturday
when the possibility might arise that I would have to be the first
to charge a pensioner $100+ for an item he or she received for
$3.60 in April just because no Medicare card is proffered.
This should really see test the strength of pharmacy's trust factor.
Personally I'm not looking forward to the next few weeks.
I ask why no pressure has been placed on the medical profession
to ensure that doctors do not write scripts for ineligible persons,
why should the pharmacist be the one to police the changes to
regulations? My colleagues at the PBS tell me the reason the onus
is placed on pharmacists is because it is the pharmacist who is
claiming payment.
This concept is one that the Guild should have fought tooth and
nail to prevent, we're health professionals not policemen.
We have all seen the speculations about the proposed rise in PBS
patient contribution rates so I expect to again hear the accusation
that "you pharmacists have raised your charges".
Pharmacy will once more bear the brunt of public anger arising
from decisions outside its control.
I am sure that you have all seen in the media the old chestnut
of pharmacy overcharging its customers and how you can save "hundreds
of dollars" by going to mail order pharmacies.
The i2P magazine, as one would expect, is a strong advocate of
the internet pharmacy concept, but will this be able to engender
the trust that the local pharmacist has developed over years of
hard work?
Pharmacy's very existence will depend on cognitive services, and
these rely on there being high levels of trust. I fear that continual
attacks on the profession will finally erode this trust, and pharmacy
will become more vulnerable.
Pharmacy organisations should look to how nursing, the only profession
with a higher trust rating than ours, uses its standing with the
public in its fights for advancement.
I just wish our public relations machine was as effective as that
of the ANF.
Nurses want a pay rise, guess what- a story suddenly appears in
the media about staff shortages, overwork and lack of remuneration.
We find that the editorial sections of newspapers are filled with
letters from members of the public, supporting those "poor,
overworked nurses" and so the issue progresses.
Pharmacists are just much in short supply, overworked and under
paid but I have yet to see numerous letters supporting any claim
for the profession.
Trust can be so powerful, let us use it or we may find it to be
merely a fleeting moment of fame for pharmacy.
Back
to Frontpage
|