..Information to Pharmacists
    _______________________________

    Your Monthly E-Magazine
    June, 2002

    Published by Computachem Services

    P.O Box 297.
    Alstonville. 2477
    NSW Australia

    Phone:
    61 2 66285138

    E-Mail
    This
    Page
    Click For a
    Printer-Friendly
    Page
    Bookmark
    This Page

     

    SIMON RUDDERHAM

    From a Post-Graduate Perspective

    Healthy Eating or Starches from the Golden Arches?

    The Federal Budget has been dissected. The results: higher costs for most prescription medications. Mind you, I would still rather pay thirty odd dollars for a Seretide Accuhaler than eighty!
    But it was preventative medicine and disease state management that made me question a problem with Australia's healthcare.

    Food Glorious Food!

    It is inherently cheaper and easier to purchase ready prepared meals than ingredients that require hard labour.
    Why collate fruits and vegetables and risk cooking a meal that was unsatisfying.
    Particularly when someone has made it their business to produce food that was of great quality.

    Hamburgers, Soft drinks, deep fried processed chicken pieces (or "nuggets" as some prefer to call them) and fat soaked chips are of very little nutritional value.
    But they fill a hole!

    It is any wonder we are becoming a larger nation in more ways than one.

    As it stands, it seems that the Federal Government is happy to sit idly by while people increase their risk factors for chronic disease states.
    Chronic disease states that require expensive medications and long term hospital costs.

    Something more than a heart foundation tick is required to educate the people of Australia what is nutritious and healthy food and what is not.
    Furthermore, they need to have their current eating habits reassessed.

    Perhaps a tax on ready prepared food, or food not classed as "nutritious" by a determining board of some kind is the answer.
    This tax could offset "nutritious food" costs.

    A tax on food?
    Forcing people to make healthy choices?
    A denial of a persons right to wolf down a greasy burger?
    Such a tax would certainly be unpopular.

    But is it much different to smoking cigarettes and the associated taxes?

    Risk factor prevention should be the aim.

    Furthermore, pharmacy's role in smoking cessation has proven itself to be worthwhile, and one hopes that this can continue.
    Why not expand this role to weight loss also?
    The frequency in which patients are told by doctors to "try and lose some weight" is almost staggering.

    Through its smoking cessation work, pharmacists are trained to be aware of the states of change of a person.
    The pharmacist is a non confrontational, non-judgemental source of information.
    Pharmacists are trustworthy.

    Weight loss in addition to other disease state management, information and education is pharmacy's ticket to greater acceptance as a member of the multidisciplinary health care team.
    Hopefully, we as a profession, can decrease risk factors with resorting to relegating Big Macs to the black market.

    Back to Front Page