I
went on many ward rounds to several different specialised clinics.
Cranwell was my favourite ward because it was not focused on one
disease state, but was for temporary admission.
In one single bed, there could be three different people in it
each day.
You would never know what to expect when visiting there
I saw a huge range of patients such as a Temaze overdose, DVT
case and even witnessed an expected myocardial infarction.
The
pharmacists worked very quickly and efficiently.
The majority of their time was spent on clinical work, which is
great in a lot of ways.
The pharmacy technicians would spend all their time typing up
labels, and getting medication off shelves. The pharmacists would
constantly be going through medication charts, ensuring all doses
were correct, that there were no interactions with the current
medications, and doing other relevant clinical interventions.
If you read my last article, you would have realised that this
operating system did concern me in many ways.
I am still not totally confident that an assistant should get
the medication off the shelf and then deliver it to the patient
without the pharmacist checking it.
I did question the department on many occasions, and they were
even able to show me statistics that technicians have been shown
to do fewer mistakes than pharmacists when it comes to dispensing
because this is their job all day.
The pharmacists are trying to juggle several tasks at once and
are more likely to make a mistake.
This does sound like a valid point, but it is still the pharmacist
that is legally responsible for the medication, and they are really
only seeing half the job being done.
Besides
ward rounds, I also witnessed how to calculate and produce specific
IV fluids, or TPN for a patient. There was a strict aseptic procedure
that had to be followed, and pharmacy technicians also did this.
There
was also a pharmacy shop for outpatients at the hospital, which
I worked at for one day.
The technicians did all the dispensing, and the one pharmacist
focused on counselling and overseeing the running protocols for
the shop.
The shop was not too busy, so one pharmacist was enough.
I
found their computer systems extremely backward.
I am not sure if this is the system used by many pharmacies, but
it was very old.
It was extremely un-user friendly and definitely required updating.
I think that running costs, and budgeting is quite difficult for
hospital pharmacies in the UK, and most likely the computer software
was not a top priority.
The
second half of my trip was in Hungary, Budapest.
I attended a pharmacy conference for pharmacy students.
There was about two hundred and fifty students present from around
thirty countries.
This was an exciting time to talk to young pharmacists from all
over the world.
The conference was organised by the International Pharmacy Students
Federation (IPSF), a large organisation that operates with many
other large organisations such as WHO (World Health Organisation).
There were many seminars that discussed world wide issues and
campaigns like AIDS awareness, tobacco, caring for the aging population,
plus student exchange possibilities and many others.
There
were many social events, such as the auction night, where each
country brought gifts from their country and were sold.
Money raised went to various projects such as the Neema project.
Its aim is for improving the health status of the villagers residing
in and around Kiromo, Buma and Mataya. This is done through various
means, including the setting up of a dispensary and health education.
Overall,
this was an experience I will never forget and was definitely
beneficial for my education, and broaden my appreciation for pharmacy.
Although it was quite costly, I believe it was an opportunity
of a lifetime that has increased my passion for pharmacy.
|