Thursday,
26th April 2001, celebrated the inaugural World Intellectual Property
Day. The day is designated as the date on which the World Intellectual
Property Organisation (WIPO) came into being back in 1970.
To mark the event WIPO has issued the following message:
"Creating
the Future Today - four words that underscore the importance of innovators
and artists to the development and growth of societies everywhere. We
owe the inventions, designs and works of art that ease our workload,
improve our living conditions and enrich and beautify our surroundings
to a long line of men and women whose creativity and invention have
led us from the inkwell to the Internet, and from railways to rockets.
Let us use this first World Intellectual Property Day to salute these
special individuals who power us forward and give us the opportunity
to create a better future. They are an encouragement to all and should
inspire us to work together - men and women, young and old of every
nation- toward a universal culture of creativity. We salute them and
pledge ourselves to ensuring that their works are put to good use for
the common benefit of all countries."
WIPO was
initially formed to protect the intellectual property rights of individuals
and organisations on a global basis. Working through a number of sub-committess,
the organisation establishes international standards for the protection
of copyright and related rights, leading to an international protocol
or treaty establishing the rights of the various stakeholders.
Australia is represented at these forums through the Attorney-General's
department.
Mention is made of the above to create an awareness of the fact that
a whole raft of new legislation is being prepared in Australia, some
of which has recently come into force, which will require a good working
knowledge of to avoid litigation problems.
Regulations will cover a vast range of topics, as indicated by the agenda
for a WIPO committee meeting to be held in Geneva from the 30th April
to the 3rd May, 2001, which will cover intellectual property issues
relating to genetic resources, indigenous traditional knowledge and
folklore. When the deliberations of this committee finally reach treaty
status, it could mean that in Australia's case, any Aboriginal symbols
(boomerangs), artwork designs, music traditional stories or traditional
craft items, may become subject to copyright, which may further involve
licensing fees if other than traditional ownership is involved in its
commercial use.
The APEC organisation, which Australia is actively involved, comprises
a group of expanding economies located around the Pacific rim. This
newsletter has previously mentioned APEC activities in the area of education
and professional practice certificates, where there is an objective
to have complete interchangeability of all trade and professional qualifications
within member economies. The engineering profession was the first to
establish a universal practice certificate, and there is no doubt that
this will occur in pharmacy when practice certificates become mandatory.
APEC also has a keen interest in intellectual property trade, which
is currently estimated at a value of $600 billion per year among the
member economies. The Intellectual Property Rights Experts Group (IPEG)
meets regularly to discuss issues surrounding trade issues, the twelfth
of such meetings having been held in Sydney on the 20th March, 2001.
Countries represented included Canada, Chile, The People's Republic
of China, Hong Kong, China, Indonesia, Japan, The Republic of Korea,
Mexico, New Zealand, Phillipines, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand,
The United States of America and Vietnam.
Policy
dialogue covered a range of "current intellectual property issues
including e-commerce, biotechnology, traditional knowledge, and geographical
indications as well as technical issues relating to the administration,
exploitation and enforcement of intellectual property rights."
The meeting was followed by a government/industry workshop on intellectual
property law enforcement and focussed on three key areas:
software, branded goods and copyright industries.
For anyone interested in viewing papers considered at this IPEG meeting,
please follow the link http://www.apecsec.org.sg
The deliberations
of WIPO and IPEG eventually find their way into Australian law and everyday
basic activities.
For example, laws such as the Digital Agenda Act have had recent amendments
covering copyright and e-mail. These amendments are hailed as the most
significant and comprehensive since 1968.
Material circulated by the Attorney-General's Dept is worth studying,
and follows:
"The
Digital Agenda Act has introduced into the Copyright Act a new broadly
based, technology-neutral right of communication to the public.
The Copyright Act defines 'communicate' as meaning to make available
online or electronically transmit (whether over a path, or combination
of paths, provided by a material substance or otherwise) a work or subject
matter.
The new right encompasses e-mail.
Contrary to some media reports, the simple act of sharing e-mail would
generally not be a criminal offence under the Copyright Act.
Forwarding an e-mail is not illegal under the Copyright Act unless
it is prejudicial to an authors' economic interests (see s.132 of the
Act).
While the forwarding of e-mails is generally not a criminal offence
under the Copyright Act, copyright may subsist in an e-mail, if the
e-mail has a sufficient level of originality.
An e-mail will be considered original if it is the creator's own intellectual
effort and has not been copied from another person's work.
No particular level of literary or artistic merit is required.
Although forwarding an e-mail could amount to a copyright infringement,
the copyright owner may also have given permission to further communicate
the e-mail.
Recipients of e-mail should therefore have regard to any copyright
notices attached to e-mail.
Conversely copyright owners wishing to limit further use of their
material should make this clear to recipients.
Other Issues:
The forwarding of an e-mail containing personal information of another
person potentially raises privacy issues. In some situations it could
amount to a breach of privacy under the Privacy Act 1988. Even if it
does not breach privacy laws then individuals should consider the appropriateness
of distributing personal information of other person."
Another
development in the orderly management of intellectual property takes
the form of a Collecting Society. Applications are currently being sought
from bodies interested in collecting fees from users of intellectual
property which may involve a multiplicity of licences and stakeholders.
Two applications have so far been received, from which one (Screenrights)
has been appointed on an interim basis until other legislative changes
are in place, giving protection to free-to-air broadcasters.
Legislation is also being developed around equipment such as DVD players,
games consoles etc. to disallow copying by circumvention, where certain
security procedures have been installed to prevent such a procedure.
Laws are also being reviewed to enforce foreign copyrights and the multiplicity
of state and federal regulations concerning all areas of copyright and
the criminal code, are also being reviewed so that there is harmonisation.
It is claimed that breaches of copyright laws internationally have cost
their owners incalculable billions of dollars in lost income. This has
translated into higher retail prices for intellectual property products
such as computer software.
Theoretically, by creating uniform global regulation and enforcement,
lower market prices will occur.
It should also improve opportunity for individuals to develop their
intellectual property without having their material pirated by stronger
organisations with marketing networks capable of outpacing that individual.
In the area of software and its prolific pirating, you may well see
a form of software rental develop, where you hire a program for a limited
time and download a current version next time you need it.
Whatever the area of intellectual property involved, Australia is about
to see a more vigilant oversight of all copyright areas, and a rigorous
enforcement of any infringements to create a base of precedents.
Just make sure you are outside of the dragnet.
ends