|
Are
we short of pharmacists
or
short
of properly structured jobs?
|
|
"The
time has come when a comprehensive review has to be undertaken of the
job being asked of pharmacists in community practice."
That
was three editions ago and since then we have asked questions relating
to the law relating to dispensing and the tasks a pharmacy technician
could do in a proper legal framework.
…and here are some comments from others…
So
long as the "pharmacist" is expected by law to take responsibility for
the final dispense task of affixing the label to a box and be ready
for collection by the patient, the job will always be tied to the dispensing
bench.
Start
at what pharmacists are doing now. Pharmacists in the community
setting are just glorified dispensing assistants punching through
250+ scripts per day. |
|
The
frenetic way that pharmacists have protected their role in the process
(of dispensing) has been to the detriment of the development of
an expanded professional role. |
If we are to stand
alone the focus has to be our knowledge of drugs, their modes of delivery
and the effects they have on our patients. Working with the medical
profession and allied health carers to provide a seamless delivery of
health care to patients can only do this.
The current remuneration of prescriptions is based on an appalling
approx $16-$18 dollars per hour for first and second year pharmacists
etc.
Pharmacy is the
only profession discouraged from getting involved (in professional activities)
by our own Guild who restrict our access via the ridiculous location
restrictions.
Pharmacists
don't have any competition from other professions in the supply of medications
yet (other than a small amount of doctor dispensing), but if we focus
on retail customers and not our patients who need our expertise, who
knows where we will end up?
I am fortunate
in the fact that, except for one day a week, I work in a different facet
of the profession that permits me to concentrate on the "more fun" aspects
of pharmacy ie counselling and education.
How can we possibly
progress as a profession when the indicator of a "good" pharmacist is
how short a time it takes to dispense a script?
…so
can we conclude that…
* A
pharmacist can do more professionally based tasks.
* Pharmacy
technicians should be legally responsible for "dispensing".
* The
Pharmacy Act and Poisons Acts should be changed to recognise "Pharmacy
Technicians".
* The
remuneration rate for pharmacists should be reviewed when their contribution
to health gains can be established.
?????????
IF
YOU AGREE WE SHALL MOVE ON TO THE WAY THIS IS PAID FOR
……..or first maybe we should look at the research needed to establish
our worth to funders and purchasers of our services!!!
|
Can
you justify your $ value contribution to people getting better from
an illness? Why is this important? Because no funder is going to
pay for a service which can not be shown to be of value in achieving
its stated aim. |
Hey
- if it was paid for without quantifiable data to prove it's value
it would be called research and would have a finite end. |
So
get the data…or watch the automated machines move in!!
Next edition-----you tell us----is the data there?
If NO then let's get it quick!!