Home

Article Archive
2000  2001

Editor:
Neil Johnston

Columnists:
Rollo Manning
Leigh Kibby

Jon Aldous
Roy Stevenson
Brett Clark
Ken Stafford


Free Subscription!
Enter Details
Email Address:
Name:
Search the Newsletter Archives
E-Newsletter.... PUBLISHED TWICE A MONTH
JULY,Edition # 29, 2001

[Home] [About The Newsletter] [Topics Covered] [Testimonials]
JON ALDOUS


* Place cursor on photograph for author details.

* Click on photograph to view list of previous articles by this author.

EDUCATION
Advertise the Learning


Recently we've seen a lot of bad press relating to pharmacy, most of it inferring strongly that pharmacists are little more than retailers, with their professional responsibilities clouded by their chase for a dollar.
While those close to the profession know the real story we've had a hard time getting much media focus and the story remains fairly one-sided and in some cases bordering on farcical.
The example which made many cringe recently, was circulated on the Aus-pharm mailing list and exposed much frustration with our recent media examination. Apparently research has shown that piglets given massive doses of promethazine have an increased risk of SIDS. Not entirely suprising given similar statistical findings in humans, but what was the media line on the story?
Pharmacists could be selling Phenergan too easily to the mothers of young children.
As one Aus-pharm respondant pointed out, the story didn't mention doctors telling the same mothers to buy a bottle of Painstop when their child is teething. It didn't also state that most 'official' pharmacy literature suggests extreme caution when using these drugs in children under the age of 12 months.
It is a sad fact that much of what we see in newspapers these days seems designed to push one agenda or another, and the pharmacy side of most stories is being ignored or consists entirely of letters to the editor days after the event, when most attention has died down.
So what can we do to overcome a lack of positive media coverage?
Pharmacy needs to start advertising as a profession, and pushing the positive aspects of our profession that continually rate so highly in consumer surveys. The public's trust is placed in pharmacists, second only to nurses, and ahead of doctors in most polls.
So this should form the basis of our advertising campaign.
The professional services which we are finally to receive some reimbursement for should form the core of any professional marketing push.
If margins are going to continually be pressured in the dispensary then it seems only natural to advertise the professional sevices where the potential for higher margins exists.
While doctors may seem reluctant to follow the DMMR model, making patients aware of its existence will force GPs to conisder it for their chronic care patients. An advertising push to remind the public of the relevance of their community pharmacy may also assist in garnering support ahead of the expected ownership push from the likes of Woolworths.
Few doubt the success of "Frank the Friendly Pharmacist" in explaining the last major changes to the PBS, so perhaps the Guild and Society need to bring him out of retirement.
In these times of anti-globalisation rallies and a general fear of multinationals, your independantly owned local pharmacy seems almost an anachronism, but its appeal will remain while ever we can continue to show our relevance.
The cost of an advertising blitz would be high, but the lasting impressions it could leave might more than justify the investment.
Admittedly not all pharmacies would benefit initially from a campaign targeted at our professional services as not all pharmacies yet employ an accredited consultant pharmacist. But as the spread of consultant pharmacy increases, few pharmacies will be unable to offer this service within the life of the current Agreement.
It's time to shout it from the rooftops. "Pharmacists, your trusted medication experts!"
Ends
The newsletter archives are now fully searchable via the search engine on the left hand side of this page. If you would like to find similar articles to the above material, please enter the appropriate keyword(s). To retain context with multiple keywords or phrases, please enclose in inverted commas.


Previous Article

Next Article
Back to Article Index

The comments and views expressed in the above article are those of the author and no other. The author welcomes any comment and interaction that may result from this and future articles.

* If you have found value in this newsletter, please share it with a friend, or alternatively, encourage a colleague to subscribe at neilj@computachem.com.au .
* Don't forget to advise of any change in your e-mail address so that your subscription may be continued without interruption.
* Letters to the editor are encouraged, or if you have material you would like published, please forward to the editor.
* You are invited to visit the Computachem web site at http://www.computachem.com.au .
* Any interested persons who would like to receive this free newsletter on their desktop each fortnight, please send a single word e-mail "Subscribe" to neilj@computachem.com.au .
* Looking for an organised reference site for medical or other references? Why not try (and bookmark) the Computachem Interweb Directory , for an easily accessed range of medical and pharmacy links, plus a host of pharmacy relevant links.
The directory also contains a very fast search engine for Internet enquiries

Back to Article Index
Article Archive 2000
Article Archive 2001
Home