Editor'
Note:
Terry
Irvine is a pharmacist of many years experience and one of the first
of our profession to fully embrace, and understand, computers and related
information technology. He appears not to have lost his idealism over
the years and retains a positive vision for his chosen profession of
pharmacy. In his first article he outlines some of the "future
shock" that may occur in pharmacy sometime down the track.
Then again, it may not.
The idea is to stimulate some thought and debate on the subject and
embrace change...not fear it.
As such, Terry is a very welcome contributor to this newsletter, for
his presentation of ideas will genuinely be "out of the square",
an inherent quality which all the Computachem writers seem to share.
Those of us who aspire to have a vision, are often moved by inspired
thoughts of others.
Terry is no exception, and shares with us quotations from a publication
containing some inspirational material, which has attracted his intense
interest, entitled:
The
Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual
(Check out the link)
"Online Markets...
Networked markets are beginning to self-organize faster than
the companies that have traditionally served them. Thanks to
the web, markets are becoming better informed, smarter, and
more demanding of qualities missing from most business organizations."
|
"...People of Earth
The
sky is open to the stars. Clouds roll over us night
and day. Oceans rise and fall. Whatever you may have
heard, this is our world, our place to be. Whatever
you've been told, our flags fly free. Our heart goes on
forever. People of Earth, remember."
|
(Copyright
© 1999 Levine, Locke, Searls & Weinberger)
The
book is a philosophical collection of ideas on the Internet and marketing.
He also points to the first chapter, by Christopher Locke, entitled:
The Internet
Apocalypso
which
is found by following the above link, and is excerpted below with slight
modification by Terry (in italics).
you
set my desire...I trip through your wires (U2)
Premature Burial
We
die.
You will never hear those words spoken in a television ad.
Yet this central fact of human existence colors our world and
how we perceive ourselves within it.
"Life is too short," we say, and it is.
Too short for office politics, for busywork and pointless paper
chases, complying with HIC edicts,for jumping through
hoops and covering our asses, for trying to please, to not offend,
for constantly struggling to achieve some ever-receding definition
of success.
Too short as well for worrying whether we bought the right suit,
the right breakfast cereal, the right laptop computer, the right
brand of underarm deodorant.
For worrying if we have the shop stock at the right price,
if we have chosen the right style and material for the staff
uniforms.
Life is too short because we die. Alone with ourselves, we sometimes
stop to wonder what's important, really.
Our kids, our friends, our lovers, our losses?
Things change and change is often painful.
People get "downsized," move away, the old neighborhood isn't
what it used to be.
Children get sick, get better, get bored, get on our nerves.
They grow up hearing news of a world more frightening than anything
in ancient fairy tales.
The wicked witch won't really push you into the oven, honey,
but watch out for AK-47s at recess.
Amazingly, we learn to live with it.
Human beings are incredibly resilient.
We know it's all temporary, that we can't freeze the good times
or hold back the bad.
We roll with the punches, regroup, rebuild, pick up the pieces,
take another shot.
We come to understand that life is just like that.
And this seemingly simple understanding is the seed of a profound
wisdom.
It is also the source of a deep hunger that pervades modern
life - a longing for something entirely different from the reality
reinforced by everyday experience. We long for more connection
between what we do for a living and what we genuinely care about,
for work that's more than clock-watching drudgery.
We long for release from anonymity, to be seen as who we feel
ourselves to be rather than as the sum of abstract metrics and
parameters.
We long to be part of a world that makes sense rather than accept
the accidental alienation imposed by market forces too large
to grasp, to even contemplate.
Testing,
Testing...
But
what's this got to do with the Internet?
A lot.
The Net grew like a weed between the cracks in the monolithic
steel-and-glass empire of traditional commerce.
It was technically obscure, impenetrable, populated by geeks
and wizards, loners, misfits.
When I started using the Internet, nobody gave a damn about
it outside of a few big universities and the military-industrial
complex they served. In fact, if you were outside that favored
circle, you couldn't even log on.
The idea that the Internet would someday constitute the world's
largest marketplace would have been laughable if anyone was
entertaining such delusions back then.
I began entertaining them publicly in 1992 and the laughter
was long and loud.
The Net grew and prospered largely because it was ignored.
It worked by different rules than the rules of business.
Market penetration wasn't interesting because there was no market
- unless it was a market for new ideas.
The Net was built by people who said things like:
What if we try this?
Nope.
What if we try that?
Nope.
What if we try this other thing?
Well, hot damn!
Look at that!
|
The
following article has been stimulated by reading the first chapter of
:
The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual
( Copyright © 1999 Levine, Locke, Searls & Weinberger)
The
first chapter is the part that can be read for free on Internet - it
is so stimulating that I am tempted to buy the entire publication -
I must look to see who sells it in Australia.
I know Amazon
do in the US but the freight charges from the US are awesome, and the
exchange rate is still poor.
Some modified paragraphs precede this glimpse into the future.
By way of personal introduction.
Many years ago I became enamored by computers, an affair that culminated
in us acquiring what was thought to be the first computer in pharmacy
- at a cost of $120,000 or the price of 20 Volvos at the time (really
powerful computers can now be purchased for less than one twentieth
of the current price of Volvos - there must be a message there somewhere).
Later we became IBM PC Dealers, I went on to graduate with a Diploma
in Applied Science (Computing) from the Charles Sturt University in
Wagga Wagga, in 1992, and our family has continued with the love affair
with computers - eldest son Rod, although a pharmacist, is some sort
of architect with Compaq Computers, based in Adelaide he has been to
New Zealand three time in the last few months and often travels to the
Eastern Capitals.
One of the twins, Bradley, is with the NT Government's computer section
and was responsible for the recent outsourcing of IT. The other twin,
Andrew, is a partner in what is probably on of the most computerized
hotels in country Australia , at Wagga Wagga.
Since leaving Darwin, most of my work has involved computers and pharmacy
to some extent, currently I am logged into Internet for many hours each
day, surfing between prescriptions.
Way back in the early days when I became aware of what computers could
do I wrote an article that was published in the AJP where I explored
the possible actions of sick people and their diagnosis.
Since then Internet has come along and provides even more facilities
for people to interact with computer systems, all over the world, and
stimulates me to flights of fancy with regard to what could be possible,
and what effect it could have on pharmacy as we know it today.
When I was first introduced to Internet by an enthusiastic lecturer
at CSU I was underwhelmed by it - not much information available, and
very slow modems - it seemed suitable for academics, but I did not want
to become one of them.
Of course since then the explosion of information available on the net
has been fantastic, and the availability of fast modems, and cable connection,
as well as Windows type presentations has meant I am forever being gobsmacked
by what I can find - sometimes I am frustrated because I cannot find
what I am looking for but his is more because I do not know how to ask
the question more than the information not existing.
So let us consider how the administration of health care may be performed
in a few years time.
The patient wakes feeling unwell, and without any idea of why.
Stumbles to the computer, picks up the laptop from beside the bed, or
tunes into the interactive digital TV. From the links already set up
on the home page of the prospective patient - whom we will call the
PP - initial diagnosis of illness is selected.
A series of questions are then asked and the PP points and clicks onto
the appropriate answers. The initial diagnosis then suggests a series
of tests to be performed, searches its data base to establish the most
appropriate appointment time at the testing facility, advises the test
required, and advises the PP of samples that need to be taken to the
test.
The test results are fed back into the PP's data base and further diagnosis
is performed.
The next step could well be an appointment at a medical facility, be
it general practitioner, specialist, or hospital.
Of course the initial diagnosis, or subsequent tests, may have detected
a condition that required immediate hospitalization, in which case the
ambulance would be automatically called.
However, assume the PP can remain ambulatory, and the practitioner prescribes
treatment. A number of scenarios could result, none of which would necessarily
involve a pharmacist, and would depend on what technology had been adopted
in the meantime.
The smart card could be universally adopted, which would mean the prescription
details would be written onto the PP's card by the prescribers computer,
the card taken to the nearest prescription medicine dispensing unit
where it would be inserted in the machine and the medicine labeled and
dispensed.
The precursors of medicine dispensing units (MDUs) already exist.
They dispense money, cigarettes, soft drinks, coffee and tea, and confectionery,
and condoms, and various other products.
Medicine dispensers would be scaled up, and kept secure in much the
same way that money in ATMs is kept secure. There would be no risk of
money being stolen from the MDUs as the financial transactions would
be automatic between the MDU and the patient's bank.
Alternatively, the prescriber could send the medicine requirements from
computer to MDU. It may be appropriate for the MDU's to be situated
in prescriber's rooms, or a building that houses multiple prescribers,
or in Service Stations, or Hotels, anywhere where people tend to congregate
and there are at least some people in attendance to increase the security
of the MDU.
On second thoughts the Service Stations of the future may only have
automated pumps, these exist now but I think the service stations turn
the links off when their shop sales are low for the day.
Of course the hotels may be automated too, with drinks only being dispensed
to people who can establish they are below the limit or can prove they
have transport home if they are over.
Details of the medicines dispensed would be sent to the patient's web
pages, and appropriate links would automatically be established.
When the patient returns home and turns to their home (Internet) they
would be advised of the new information links that had been established,
and encouraged to visit those sites.
This is much the same as the screen that greets you in some hotel rooms
now, except that rather than inviting you to look at the inhouse movies
you could be treated to broadcasts which acquaint you with information
on your illness.
Printed information would be available of course, on the Internet, with
hot links to further explain terminology with which the patient is unfamiliar.
So where does the pharmacist fit into these scenes?
Already in the UK enrolments in Pharmacy schools are down, even though
they are proposing the establishment of two new schools in England.
Could it be that the word is getting out that pharmacy is not too exciting,
neither true professional nor trained retail trader?
The concept of forward dispensing is honorable, but how much really
goes on?
Is it only a way to dispense while sitting down, instead of standing
in front of a computer?
My impression of prescription dispensing is that the majority of prescriptions
are for continuing therapy for stabilized patients, who from their own
experience with the medication are more familiar with it than many pharmacists.
Could we see the emergence of a select few, really well trained, motivated
pharmacists, skilled in drug knowledge and communication who, for a
fee, discuss the very complicated therapeutic regimes with the prescriber
and the patient, and/or patient's carer?
Perhaps the role for many pharmacists could be in the monitoring of
patients' conditions, by sampling blood and other fluids, assessing
the results and then modifying the dose in response to the findings.
Dispensing continuing therapy without the need for medical consultations
could be a consequence of this action.
However, it is conceivable that medical technicians could perform the
tests at less cost than using pharmacists.
I have no idea how these scenarios could be adapted to the hospital
setting.
Could we see automated dispensing at ward level?
Are pharmacists better rewarded professionally but not financially in
hospitals?
Are they better recognized as peers by medical practitioners?
If this is so, how does this relationship suffer when doctors leave
hospitals and pharmacists practice in "open shop"?
Comments are welcome.
Ends
The
newsletter archives are now fully searchable via the search engine on
the left hand side of this page. If you would like to find similar articles
to the above material, please enter the appropriate keyword(s). To retain
context with multiple keywords or phrases, please enclose in inverted
commas.
Previous Article
|
Next Article
|
The
comments and views expressed in the above article are those of the author
and no other. The author welcomes any comment and interaction that may
result from this and future articles.
*
If you have found value in this newsletter, please share it with a friend,
or alternatively, encourage a colleague to subscribe at neilj@computachem.com.au
.
* Don't forget to advise of any change in your e-mail address so that
your subscription may be continued without interruption.
* Letters to the editor are encouraged, or if you have material you would
like published, please forward to the editor.
* You are invited to visit the Computachem web site at http://www.computachem.com.au
.
* Any interested persons who would like to receive this free newsletter
on their desktop each fortnight, please send a single word e-mail "Subscribe"
to neilj@computachem.com.au
.
* Looking for an organised reference site for medical or other references?
Why not try (and bookmark) the Computachem
Interweb Directory , for an easily accessed range of medical and pharmacy
links, plus a host of pharmacy relevant links.
The directory also contains a very fast search engine for Internet enquiries
Back
to Article Index
Article
Archive 2000
Article
Archive 2001
Home
|