In a recent
E-newsletter article I stressed the importance of Pharmacy advertising
its professional services, and its abilities, in order to promote awareness
of the services available in community pharmacies.
This is particularly pertinent now that we are in the implementation
phase of the Domiciliary Medication Management Review (DMMR) programme.
The need for this advertising again cropped up to me recently when speaking
to a non-pharmacist friend about the prices for over-the-counter (OTC)
items.
It was a sobering experience for someone only 12 months out of Pharmacy
School and still enthused about the future of our profession.
The conversation started when I suggested that the price she had paid
was not the cheapest I'd seen, and she replied:
"Pharmacy Direct would be cheaper... but for the postage".
I probed to find out where she'd gotten onto Pharmacy Direct (her doctor
of course!).
No disrespect to Peter Brown intended, but I remarked that you miss
out on some of the service from a community pharmacy when you use mail
order.
The reply shot back:
"What service... you send in the script, they send you the medication".
I decided against filling her in on all the benefits of having a regular
community pharmacy because it was off-topic, but the thoughts stayed
in my head.
This is only one isolated case, but you can be sure there are many more
like it.
I remember
working in a Pharmacist Advice and the not inconsiderable number of
patients who found it an imposition to sit down and talk about their
prescription. They were a significant minority, but the others had probably
decided to take their custom elsewhere in the past.
So while a large proportion of the patient population is not aware of
the many professional services they receive from their pharmacies, you
have to wonder what percentage of patients won't see the benefits of
a DMMR?
Most patients seem to appreciate taking the smallest number of pills
possible but that is not the sole aim of DMMRs. Some patients may end
up taking more medications if pharmacists believe there is under-prescribing.
Will they appreciate that?
It was somewhat heartening that the following night I opened the latest
Australian Pharmacist to find an article about a pharmacy in Melbourne
which had devoted itself almost entirely to professional services.
A complete "forward pharmacy" model with technicians doing all the dispensing
for a team of pharmacists which chatted to patients at purpose designed
stations.
Pharmacists also had time devoted to performing medication reviews,
and had built a strong relationship with local medicos. One wall appeared
to be covered with every piece of health information ever produced,
and the lines presented prominently for sale were blood pressure and
glucose meters, with some normal "shop" lines stored under benches.
This sort of model does a lot to promote the free professional services
we can offer, so one can only hope that if we can continue to showcase
this, we can work towards further payments for these services.
It still remains a challenge for Pharmacy to make the patient population
aware of all we have to offer.
We see continual media attention paid to the concerns of nurses, teachers
etc; but pharmacists seem to attract only negative publicity.
(No doubt if we get the promised GST concessions, community pharmacists
will be frowned on by less fortunate small business people.)
Pharmacists are also slipping on the scale of public trust.
Recently we were reported to have slipped to #4, from our former lofty
heights as #1 or 2.
It's time to redress the negative publicity and start some positive
publicity of our own.
As corny as their jingle might be, Pharmacist Advice is doing a great
job at promoting our professional services, and setting benchmarks with
their advertising.
This seems to sit in stark contrast to the other groups who seem more
concerned with using their advertising to push product, which doesn't
do much to differentiate us from any supermarket or chain store, no
matter how much health advice framework you put around it.
It's time to acknowledge the intelligence of our patients in perceiving
value for money.
If they can't see any value in our professional services, then they'll
continue to use supermarkets or settle for mail-order.
We need to re-educate the public about what we can offer before its
too late.
Ends
Back
to Article Index
Newsletter
Reader's Forum
Previous Article
|
Next Article
|
The
comments and views expressed in the above article are those of
the author and no other. The author welcomes any comment and interaction,
directly or via the Newsletter Reader's Forum.
|
The
newsletter archives are now fully searchable via the search engine
on the left hand side of this page. If you would like to find
similar articles to the above material, please enter the appropriate
keyword(s). To retain context with multiple keywords or phrases,
please enclose in inverted commas.
|
*
Please contact us if you would like further information or would
like us to research additional material to publish as future articles.
|
*
Don't forget to advise of any change in your e-mail address so that
your subscription may be continued without interruption.
|
*
Letters to the editor are encouraged, or if you have material you
would like published, please forward to the editor.
|
*
Any interested persons who would like to receive this free newsletter
on their desktop each fortnight, please send a single word e-mail
"Subscribe"
|
*
If you have found value in this newsletter, please share it with
a friend, or alternatively, encourage a colleague to subscribe
|
|
*
You are invited to visit the Computachem web site and check out
an organised reference site for medical or other references.
Why not try (and bookmark) the
Computachem Interweb Directory
for an easily accessed range of medical and
pharmacy links, plus a host of pharmacy relevant links.
The directory also contains a very fast search engine for Internet
enquiries. You may also access the Home Page at:
http://www.computachem.com.au
|
|