I
watched a news report last night about a stop work meeting by nurses.
They are (I think) first, on the scale of "most trusted", and we are
second.
The rally call was "Nurses know that the current workload is unsustainable".
I have read an article by a consultant to the Guild, which quotes Kos
Sclavos.
I have read an overview of Pharmacy by John Bronger, in recent pharmacy
Press.
When I think about the Nurses situation, and what I/we have to do just
to get through the day, I think we are not that different.
The New Age Pharmacy is unachievable because the workload of the pharmacist
is unsustainable.
Nobody seems to wants to hear about the unsustainable workload.
Like
Nurses, we deal with the health, and care of homo sapiens.
Like them, we are not allowed to make mistakes, however overloaded we
are.
An article by Jenny Bergin (Pharmacist consultant to the Guild) in the
September Pharmacy Review, quotes Kos Sclavos saying:
"It is human to make errors, but by analysing what errors occur, when
they occur, and at what time they occur will allow answers to the problems
to be identified."
The same article states that "there may be a positive or negative correlation
with workload pharmacists' effectiveness".
While neither of these quotes makes grammatical sense to me, I can understand
the messages.
That article states that Pharmacists dispensing less than 15 items per
hours are associated with as many mistakes as "high volume pharmacies
(more than 25 prescriptions per hour)".
The range of prescriptions/hour dispensed was 2.8 to 31.6.
Fify percent of pharmacies dispense more than 11.5 prescriptions.
In 1998/99 the number of prescriptions dispensed for every hour worked
by qualified staff in the dispensary was 11.5, or one prescription every
5.2 minutes So …. Jenny Bergin Pharmacist consultant to the Guild, defines
high script volume as more than 25 prescriptions per hour, and that
the average per pharmacist is 11.5 items.
These figures would seem to confirm my own experience, and that of many
respected commentators, that a single pharmacist working with one technician,
should not do more than 120 items per day - above that figure, we are
more likely to make dispensing errors.
There is a high profile Guild identity who has a large pharmacy in the
Newcastle area, which has a very high script/pharmacist/hour volume.
I presume he would say that he only employs super-pharmacists who can
function safely at these levels, and/or has super systems and support.
I would say that it is not possible - repeat IMPOSSIBLE - to run at
more than Jenny Bergin's 25 items per hour, AND (at the same time) perform
all the professional pharmacist duties in the pharmacy, with only one
pharmacist.
That pharmacy runs a lot of the time with only one pharmacist.
We all know that it is not the number of items per day statistic, which
is relevant. It is the number of items per each hour.
That volume number might run for 3 or 4 hours of a 9 hour day, but may
account for 75% of the daily count. I have worked in pharmacies which
operate at up to 50 items per hour with one pharmacist and up to two
techos.
At that rate, I am simply thrashing out items at high speed, and missing
heaps, I should not have to miss.
Contact with patients is (by necessity) minimal.
This rate can continue for three hours straight.
As a locum, I don't have the luxury of recognising the "regular" S2
and S3 customers, so I take a professional risk every time I nod at
the Mersyndol/Ventolin passing over the counter.
If I do become involved in a ten minute consultation with a patient,
on "whatever", that 50 items per hour could become 62 items per hour.
For me, that is stressful.
I would contend that this rate is not unusual in the real world.
I have also worked in Pharmacies who run at 40 items per hour for 3
hours, but end up doing only 150/160 for the whole day.
I am still at risk for the 3 heavy hours, and do not feel professionally
satisfied.
So Kos Sclavos ….. it IS human to make errors!
Every
one knows what errors occur, when they occur, and at what time they
occur but answers to the problems have NOT been identified.
John Bronger acknowledges the shortage of pharmacists, but dismisses
it because it is "worldwide" (!).
QCPP is not the answer.
CMI is going to make the problem much worse.
DMMR will exacerbate the shortage of pharmacists.
These are NOT Kos's "answers" to the problem - they MUST surely make
it WORSE - correct me if I am wrong, Kos.
John Bronger praises the ability of Oz pharmacists to change, but at
what cost to Oz Pharmacists?
I have seen tremendous change in the morale of pharmacists over the
last few years.
Continuing education is declining, because pharmacists are burying their
heads up their bottoms. Both Kos and John would surely NOT try to tell
us, that improved systems and staff training only, will fix the problems
of Pharmacy in 2001.
The overriding reason for most dispensing errors is the unsustainable
workload for most pharmacists.
I cannot think of a single initiative, which has been directed at fixing
that problem.
Educating more pharmacists into the present pharmacist workflows, will
very quickly drive young pharmacists out of community pharmacy.
Standing, head-down in a dispensary for 2-3 hours straight, checking
50 items an hour, while being constantly interrupted, is not my idea
of professional satisfaction.
It
is simply not good enough to force all this workload on us, telling
us that the profession MUST handle these new initiatives, while you
know that the average pharmacist is already stressed and overworked.
Kos/John … you have to be honest.
Most thinking Pharmacists would agree totally, that what you are doing
is right. The only way Australian Pharmacy can move forward into this
New Age Pharmacy, is by better utilisation of the pharmacists in Australia
NOW.
* You have to be honest enough to encourage Pharmacists to either sell,
or amalgamate with the guy down the road. That is starting to happen,
but I fear we will run out of time.
*
You have to change the attitude of individual pharmacists that the only
statistic we should look at is the number of scripts we do in a day.
From a business point of view, 400 items a day for one pharmacist is
good.
From a professional point of view it is a disaster!
*
You have to change the ambitions of young pharmacists to own their own
pharmacies. A partnership in an established multi-pharmacist pharmacy
is the way to go.
*
You have to really (like REALLY! - Yeah, DEMAND!) pressure Government
to stop heaping bureaucratic crap on us.
The technology exists to do this.
Privacy Regulations have to be addressed and overcome.
Every pharmacy HAS to be linked securely to the HIC computer.
Phil Dibben has resigned the Vice Presidency of the National Guild.
As a Newcastle Boy, his input to the profession will be SADLY missed.
His opinions and statements were greatly valued by we local pharmacists.
If he said it was right …. IT was RIGHT!
Phil instigated the kind of HIC-link initiatives I am talking about.
Where are these initiatives NOW….. now that Phil is gone???
In
a direct challenge, to our Leaders …. maybe you would like to komment
on these ravings through the medium of Computachem.
We KNOW you are watching….!
If I am taken out by an assassination attempt, or a Bloody Big Stealth
bomber in the middle of the night … ???
On a lighter note … use your Internet search engine to look for gerbil.wav.
Just type that in, and you will come up with 50 sites.
Ignore the Bin Laden filth, and the other doubtful material, but download
the Gerbil story and listen to it.
Whenever I am sad, I listen to it.
It makes me laugh till I cry.
If you like it, email me.
Kind
regards Roy
PS - I will stand at the November 11 Election as the kandidate for Daylight
Saving. I want daylight saving to be introduced at the beginning of
October.
The sun rises at 5.00am on Lake Macquarie.
Now for a little humour:
Jack
was going to be married to Jill, so his father sat him down for a little
fireside chat.
He said, "Jack, let me tell you something. On my wedding night in our
honeymoon suite, I took off my pants and handed them to your mother,
and said, 'Here honey, try these on'."
So she did and said, "Well sweetie they're a little too big, I can't
wear them."
So I replied, ..."'Exactly. I wear the pants in this family and I always
will'
Ever since that night we have never had any problems."
"Hmmm," said Jack.
He thinks that might be a good thing to try.
So, on his honeymoon Jack takes off his pants and says to Jill, "Here
babe, try these on".
So she does and said, "These are too large, they don't fit me."
So Jack said, "...Exactly. I wear the pants in this family and I always
will, and I don't want you to ever forget that."
Then Jill takes off her knickers and hands them to Jack and said, "Here,
you try on mine."
So he does and said, "I can't even get into your knickers."
So Jill says,"...Exactly, and if you don't change your attitude, you
never will."
Ends
Back
to Article Index
Newsletter
Reader's Forum