Computachem
Editor's Note:
We are pleased to announce that we have formed an alliance with Health
Communications Network (HCN), an Australian company that is heavily
involved in e-health. With permission, we have extracted focus items
from their recent newsletter which should prove of interest to pharmacists.
Note that the second item, the top 20 prescriptions written by GP's
is provided by the GPRN database noted above.
Measuring
alcohol risk
Alcohol
is second to tobacco as the greatest cause of drug-related mortality
in Australia.(1)
Mathers et al(2) estimated that alcohol consumption accounted for 4.9%
of the total burden of disease in Australia in 1996 but, because low
consumption of alcohol can protect against some diseases, the net burden
was 2.2%.
Early intervention is a proven and effective method of reducing alcohol
consumption in early stage problem drinkers before greater harm can
be done.(3,4,5)
Research has shown brief advice from a GP can result in a 25-30% reduction
in alcohol consumption and a 45% reduction in the number of excessive
drinkers.(5)
It is estimated that at one in three encounters with adult patients,
the GP will be dealing with a person drinking 'at risk' levels of alcohol.(6)
This HCW looks at:
* how often GPs record alcohol consumption in their electronic patient
record.
*levels of alcohol consumption recorded for GPRN patients
In
Medical Director patient alcohol consumption can be recorded as number
of standard drinks per day in the Social/family history
section of the Patient Details. Recording of alcohol use is valuable
because of:
1. the potential impact on health of excess alcohol consumption
2. the opportunity to provide brief advice if appropriate.
Data used: Data from the GPRN database for visits between January
1999 and October 2001 were examined.
We were interested in
*the
proportion of doctors who recorded information in the "Standard drinks
per day" field in the patient history
* the proportion of their patients for whom it was recorded.
Patients aged less than 18 were not included.
GP recording of 'standard drinks per day'
Of the 287 GPs participating in the GPRN since January 1999, 59% had
made at least one recording for patient consumption of alcohol.
However, the proportion of total patients who had any alcohol recording
at all was small (5.4%). There were only 29,423 valid recordings of
standard drinks per day for adult patients (>18 yrs) in the GPRN database.
Males made up of 48.5% of these.
There are several possible explanations for the low levels of recording
of alcohol consumption:
*
GPs may not usually record alcohol consumption as a standard part of
the history, * GPs may record it in a paper file but not in MD,
* GPs may not record it in this field.
Alcohol
consumption of patients in the GPRN
From
the Queensland Health Department’s Making sense of Standard
Drinks resources.
A standard drink contains 10 grams of alcohol.
The following are equivalent to one standard drink:
* 1 schooner of light beer (425mls)
* 1 middy of full strength beer (285mls)
* 1 small glass of wine (100 mls).
* 1 small glass of fortified wine (60mls) 1 nip of spirits (30
mls)
Table
1 shows levels of alcohol consumption in the GPRN data and risk
by patient age and sex. The recordings made were grouped according
to the definition of risk below. Definitions 'At risk' levels
of alcohol consumption according to NHMRC guidelines(3) are
as follows:
* for men - more than 4 standard drinks per day
* for women - more than 2 standard drinks per day(3)
More than 6 standard drinks per day for males, or more than
4 standard drinks per day for females is considered a harmful
level of alcohol consumption.(2)
|
Table
1: Alcohol consumption by age group. |
|
Alcohol
consumption (standard drinks per day) |
Age
group |
|
18-24 |
25-44 |
45-64 |
65-74 |
75+ |
MALES |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-drinker |
50.1 |
31.1 |
28.4 |
32.5 |
42.6 |
Moderate
drinker |
47.4 |
60.7 |
59.5 |
58.5 |
53.3 |
'At
risk' drinker |
2.5 |
8.2 |
12.2 |
9 |
4.1 |
FEMALES |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-drinker |
64.8 |
51.3 |
50.8 |
63.8 |
71.5 |
Moderate
drinker |
33.7 |
44.9 |
43.9 |
33 |
25.7 |
'At
risk' drinker |
1.6 |
3.9 |
5.3 |
3.3 |
2.8 |
GPRN
database at 31 Oct 2001 – proportions based on patients with
alcohol consumption recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the GPRN data, 50% of males and 64.8% of females in the 18-24
age group were non-drinkers. The largest proportion of 'at risk'
drinkers was in the 45-64 year age group – in which 12.2% of males
and 5.3% of females were at risk.
In
a 1995 survey of the general population, 14.6% of males and 12.7%
of females reported 'at risk' levels of drinking.(3)
In the GPRN data presented here, 8.4% of males and 3.6% of females
had 'at risk' levels of alcohol consumption.
The differences could be due to the fact that GPRN data is passively
collected, and that only one piece of information is available
to calculate risk.
Frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption would provide a
more complete estimate of risk.
There may also be biases in the types of GPs who record alcohol
usage, or the patients for whom they record such information.
It is also possible that patients under-report alcohol use to
their doctor.
GPRN
data could be improved by more complete recording of alcohol information.
However, it would still be possible to investigate cohorts of
patients who have their status recorded and the health events
related to different levels of risk.
|
What
can GPs do?
The
time of recording and updating patient history is an opportunity for
GPs to briefly enquire about alcohol and if appropriate, provide brief
advice about the levels of alcohol consumption that may increase risk.
Recording of alcohol consumption is important for diagnostic and preventive
health reasons.
GPs can
*
Be aware of high risk levels of alcohol consumption
* Ask patients about alcohol consumption
* Record and monitor alcohol consumption
* Educate and advise when appropriate
* Relate alcohol consumption to the presenting problem when appropriate.
References
1.
Higgins K, Cooper-Stanbury M and Williams P 2000. Statistics on drug
use in Australia 1998. AIHW cat. No. PHE 16. Canberra AIHW (Drug Statistics
Series).
2. Mathers C, Vos T, and Stevenson C 1999. The burden of disease and
injury in Australia. AIHW Cat. No. PHE 17. Canberra: Australian Institute
of Health and Welfare.
3. Mattick RP and Jarvis T 1993. An outline for the management of alcohol
problems: quality assurance project, Canberra: AGSP. National Health
and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1992. Is there a safe level of
daily consumption of alcohol for men and women?: Recommendations regarding
responsible drinking behaviour. Canberra: AGPS.
4. Bien TH, Miller WR and Tonigan JS 1993. Brief interventions for alcohol
problems: a review. Addiction 88: 315-36
5. Richmond R and Anderson P 1994. Research in general practice for
smokers and excessive drinkers in Australia and the UK 1. Interpretation
of results. Addiction 89:35-40.
6. Sayer GP, Britt H, Horn F, Bhasale A, McGeechan K, Charles J, Miller
G, Hull B, Scahill S 2000. Measures of health and health care delivery
in general practice in Australia. AIHW Cat. No. GEP3. Canberra: Australian
Institute of Health and Welfare (General Practice Series no. 3).
Recording
Alcohol Consumption in MD
Patient Details > Family/Social History
Or click on any patient detail field (eg name) and go to the Family/Social
history tab. Alcohol consumption can be recorded in the field, by asking
the patient how many standard drinks a day they consume on average.
Additional information about alcohol usage could be recorded in the
notes section.
Allergic
rhinitis surveillance
The chart below shows the rate of Allergic Rhinitis visits per 1000
up till 18 November 2001.
Allergic rhinitis visits are where Allergic Rhinitis or hay fever recorded
as diagnosis Mometasone or Ipratropium nasal spray prescribed.
These two products were chosen as their indications are specifically
Allergic Rhinitis and not other Allergic conditions.
Part of the challenge of surveillance of this condition is that a large
proportion of the treatments are available over-the-counter.
Nonetheless, for those patients requiring more aggressive therapy, GPRN
data should reflect the seasonal nature of the condition.
The chart suggests a higher number of visits this year’s Spring than
the previous 2 years.
Top
20 Medications prescribed in General Practice this week
(weighted by no of repeats)
|
This
month |
Last
month |
This
year |
Generic
medication |
Rank |
Percent
|
Rank
|
Percent |
Rank
|
Percent |
Salbutamol
sulfate
|
1 |
2.9 |
1 |
3.04 |
1 |
3.08 |
Atorvastatin
|
2 |
2.66 |
2 |
2.59 |
3 |
2.46 |
Simvastatin
|
3 |
2.29 |
3 |
2.57 |
2 |
2.52 |
Paracetamol
|
4 |
2.16 |
4 |
2.16 |
6 |
2.06 |
Omeprazole
magnesium
|
5 |
2.01 |
6 |
1.87 |
13 |
1.39 |
Ranitidine
hydrochloride
|
6 |
1.86 |
7 |
1.79 |
4 |
2.21 |
Celecoxib
|
7 |
1.77 |
5 |
1.9 |
5 |
2.16 |
Atenolol
|
8 |
1.73 |
9 |
1.64 |
7 |
1.68 |
Fluticasone
propionate/salmeterol xinafoate
|
9 |
1.48 |
11 |
1.45 |
21 |
1.01 |
Rofecoxib
|
10 |
1.44 |
10 |
1.56 |
18 |
1.1 |
Amoxycillin
|
11 |
1.44 |
8 |
1.66 |
9 |
1.43 |
Paracetamol/codeine
phosphate
|
12 |
1.42 |
12 |
1.37 |
12 |
1.39 |
Methadone
|
13 |
1.37 |
48 |
0.61 |
51 |
0.63 |
Irbesartan
|
14 |
1.32 |
14 |
1.29 |
10 |
1.41 |
Levonorgestrel/
ethinyloestradiol
|
15 |
1.28 |
13 |
1.35 |
8 |
1.43 |
Perindopril
erbumine
|
16 |
1.25 |
20 |
1.11 |
17 |
1.14 |
Sertraline
hydrochloride
|
17 |
1.24 |
17 |
1.23 |
11 |
1.39 |
Temazepam
|
18 |
1.17 |
15 |
1.24 |
14 |
1.27 |
Metformin
hydrochloride
|
19 |
1.15 |
16 |
1.24 |
15 |
1.22 |
Ramipril
|
20 |
1.11 |
18 |
1.23 |
19 |
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This month
= four weeks ending 18 Nov 2001
Last month = four weeks ending 21 October 2001
This year = 19 Nov 2000 to 18 Nov 2001
Last data supplied: 18 November 2001
Data source: GPRN Health Communication
Network Editorial Review: Geoffrey Sayer * Dr Frank
Pyefinch
Contributing Authors: Fiona Horn * Leigh Hendrie * Kevin McGeechan *
Geoffrey Sayer
Editor: Alice Bhasale
Health Communication Network,
PO Box 67 St Leonards NSW 1590 ph 02 9906 6633 email: research@hcn.com.au.
|
A
Happy Christmas from all at HCN
|
Ends