Hi
Neil,
This
is the beginning of my "long week", I worked today and
will work everyday until next Saturday, so it is a bit of a strain
to assemble thoughts about what has happened in this part of the
world.
Beginning
with the most recent event, yesterday afternoon there was a Pharmaceutical
Exposition for the GPs of the area, not too many pharmacists were
in evidence although they had all been invited.
Four lectures of an hour each relieved the monotony of collecting
pens and other branded gifts (will I receive sympathy if I use
the Viagra umbrella when we are in Europe?).
Three of the lectures were by local specialists, and I now know
a little more about urology, not very much about echocardiograms,
and quite a good deal more about skin problems.
HIC
also made a presentation, one of the items concerned Doctor Shopping.
It eludes me that they are not able to do more to curb this problem,
surely with the recording of items in our dispense software they
could easily determine patients who are visiting multiple pharmacies
and multiple doctors, then locate these people and punish them
if that is thought appropriate.
While
on the subject of recording, currently most of the pseudoephedrine
sales we make are recorded in a book, lately I have taken to recording
them in the dispense computers when the sale accompanies prescription
items.
Surely electronic recording should be mandatory with files being
transmitted frequently to somewhere where the information can
be collated and obvious shopping patterns revealed?
Our usual identification required is a drivers licence, if the
Road Transport Authority (RTA) cooperated and had a record of
the registration of the vehicles usually used by the pseudoephedrine
shoppers the police could then make arrests, which would be especially
useful if the shoppers were high on the drugs they manufacture.
Electronic transmission of S8 information was happening in South
Australia when I was there last year, but NSW seems happy for
us to use registers with written records that go nowhere.
For all the good that does in the location and identification
of drug abusers we may as well bury the records in the back yard
of the pharmacy (if we had one).
I
was tempted to discuss the return of prescriptions by HIC with
their representatives, but thought better of it as it was obviously
not their area of expertise.
Country pharmacies are bedevilled with prescriptions returned
with code 113, or something like that, when they have not been
endorsed "immediate supply necessary".
Some of these prescriptions are for patients who obviously live
away from any pharmacies.
Some of these people travel hundreds of kilometres to come to
town, and visit infrequently, so surely some consideration could
be given to this?
Also those patients whose dose regime is more than normal and
therefore have less than a month's supply of their medication
should be recognised by the HIC staff and the nitpicking return
of these scripts be eliminated.
I know the latter patients should have authority prescription,
but some doctors seem to be reluctant to talk on the phone to
people who are not sick.
That
is all for the time being Neil, I am cognisant of Plato's saying:
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools
because they have to say something."
Regards
Terry
|